Agenda and draft minutes

Apologies for absence were received from Cllrs Brand, Reilly and Hartmann.

To confirm the minutes of the meetings held on 8 and 13 May 2024 as a correct record.

RESOLVED:

That the minutes of the meetings held on 8 and 13 of May be agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

To note any declarations of interest made by members in connection with an agenda item.  The nature of the interest must also be specified.

Members are asked to discuss any possible interests with Democratic Services prior to the meeting.

Cllr J Richards declared a non-pecuniary interest in application 24/10176 as the local ward Councillor. Damerham Parish Council had commented on the application however Cllr Richards did not attend the planning committee meeting nor had she commented on the application. She therefore concluded that as she had not been involved or attended any meetings where this application was discussed there were no grounds under common law to prevent her from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote

To determine the applications set out below:

Storage container and fuel tanks (Retrospective)

RECOMMENDED:

Grant subject to conditions.

Details:

Storage container and fuel tanks (Retrospective).

Public Participants:

Mr Jerry Davies - Jerry Davies Planning Consultancy (Agent)

Mr Wilson (Objector)

Cllr Phil Tandy - Chair Damerham Parish Council, (representation was read out by Officer).

Additional Representations:

A further representation was received following the publication of the Committee Report. The main issues raised were are as follows:

·       The applicant should not have installed the diesel tanks in full knowledge they were located within the cleared area.

·       The container had not been in situ for more than 10 years. The representation also refers to matters outside the scope of this planning application.

Comment:

Cllr J Richards declared a non-pecuniary interest in application 24/10176 as the local ward Councillor. Damerham Parish Council had commented on the application however Cllr Richards did not attend the planning committee meeting nor had she commented on the application. She therefore concluded that as she had not been involved or attended any meetings where this application was discussed there were no grounds under common law to prevent her from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Members considered the context of the site, namely the SINC (Site of Importance for Natural Conservation), the Tree Preservation Order (TPO) area, proximity to the National Park and the historic woodland. There was concern over protection of the scenic beauty and of biodiversity on the site. It was felt that these elements could be at risk by the placement of the tanks. The environmental damage that had already occurred at the development site due to spillage from the tanks was discussed and further concerns were raised regarding the vehicular usage on the site and the environmental impact this could have.

Some members did acknowledge that the environmental and biodiversity damage had already been made to the site and that relocation of the tanks might make the matter worse. However, it was felt that not enough consideration had been given to relocating the tanks to an area that would have less environmental impact and would not encroach on the SINC (Site of Importance for Natural Conservation) or the Tree Preservation Order (TPO) area. Furthermore, certain members questioned whether, following relocation or removal of the tanks, the damaged aspects of the area would heal and return to their previous state.

The Committee gave regard to the planning history of the site and to the comments made by the public speakers at the meeting. There were queries over when the storage container unit and tanks had first been placed on site.

Decision:

Refuse, contrary to the Officer’s recommendation.

Conditions / Reasons:

By virtue of the siting of the fuel tanks and their continued use, the proposal would give rise to further incremental damage to the Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC). The retention of the fuel tanks is not considered to outweigh the biodiversity damage to the SINC nor does their retention incorporate features to encourage future biodiversity net gain. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy DM2 of the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6a

Redevelopment of the single-storey in-patient unit (IPU) building to form a new two-and-a-half storey IPU building with ancillary staff facilities and office space; construct two-storey education pavilion to replace the existing sheds.

RECOMMENDED:

Grant subject to conditions.

Details:

Redevelopment of the single-storey in-patient unit (IPU) building to form a new two-and-a-half storey IPU building with ancillary staff facilities and office space; construct two-storey education pavilion to replace the existing sheds.

Public Participants:

None.

Additional Representations:

None.

Comment:

Following submission of the committee report an application was submitted under application reference 24/10401 on the land to the north of the application site for:

Hybrid planning application for the erection of 30 dwellings and associated access, open space and landscaping. Detailed permission is sought for 26 dwellings including 15 age-restricted affordable dwellings (over 55s) to form phases 1 and 2 of the proposed; access off Lower Pennington Lane and internal road layout; provision of alternative natural recreational green space; public open space and local area of play; and car parking for Oakhaven Hospice.

Outline permission is sought for 4 custom built units, each to be developed as separate phases of development. (Access and landscaping are in detail with appearance, layout and scale as reserved matters.) Demolition of existing bungalow.

Taking into account the set back of the proposed development from the northern boundary it is not considered the submission of this application changes any of the material considerations laid out in the committee report. 

Decision:

Grant subject to conditions.

Conditions / Reasons:

As per report (Item 3b) and update note.

Note: Cllr Crisell was not present for this item.

Conversion of West Range Barn to single dwelling and The Stable to Annex associated with the function of the main Farmhouse Building; External alterations to replace existing windows and doors.

RECOMMENDED:

Grant subject to conditions.

Details:

Conversion of West Range Barn to single dwelling and The Stable to Annex associated with the function of the main Farmhouse Building; External alterations to replace existing windows and doors.

Public Participants:

Mrs. Carol Evans - Evans & Traves LLP (Agent)

Additional Representations:

None.

Comment:

None

Decision:

Grant subject to conditions.

Conditions / Reasons:

As per report (Item 3c).

Conversion of West Range Barn to single dwelling and The Stable to Annex associated with the function of the main Farmhouse Building; Internal Alterations; External alterations to replace existing windows and doors (Application for Listed Building Consent).

RECOMMENDED:

Grant Listed Building consent.

Details:

Conversion of West Range Barn to single dwelling and The Stable to Annex associated with the function of the main Farmhouse Building; Internal Alterations; External alterations to replace existing windows and doors (Application for Listed Building Consent).

Public Participants:

Mrs. Carol Evans - Evans & Traves LLP (Agent)

Additional Representations:

None.

Comment:

None

Decision:

Grant subject to conditions.

Conditions / Reasons:

As per report (Item 3d).