Declarations
Meeting: Wednesday, 13th September, 2023 9.00 am - Planning Committee
3j Land of 24 & 26 Moorland Avenue, Barton-on-Sea, New Milton (Application 23/10490)
- Cllr David Hawkins - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hawkins disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of the Planning Committee of New Milton Town Council. He concluded that as he had not expressed a view on the application there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.
Meeting: Wednesday, 13th September, 2023 9.00 am - Planning Committee
3m Andrew Lane, Ashley, New Milton (Application 23/10780)
- Cllr David Hawkins - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hawkins disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of the Planning Committee of New Milton Town Council which had commented on the application. Cllr Hawkins reported that he had not expressed a view on the application, but as the application was within the ward where he lived, he would not participate or vote on the application. He remained present during the consideration of the item.
Meeting: Wednesday, 14th February, 2024 9.00 am - Planning Committee
3b Land North of Manor Road, Milford-on-Sea (Application 23/10476)
- Cllr David Hawkins - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hawkins declared a non-pecuniary interest in application 23/10476 as a member of the Milford-on-Sea Parish Council Planning Committee which had commented on the application. As he had not participated in the Parish Council’s Planning Committee nor had he discussed the matter with anyone and retained an open mind, he concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.
Meeting: Wednesday, 8th May, 2024 9.00 am - Planning Committee
3b Land at Everton Nurseries, Christchurch Road, Everton, Hordle (Application 23/10623)
- Cllr David Hawkins - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hawkins disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as the Ward Cllr for Milford & Hordle for transparency purposes. He reported that he had not been involved in any discussions in relation to the application but had met with the nursery to understand the application. He concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.