Declarations of interest

 Declarations

Meeting:  Wednesday, 12th March, 2025 9.00 am - Planning Committee

3d Land rear of Waltons Avenue, Holbury, Fawley SO45 2LU (Application 24/10656)

  • Cllr Matthew Hartmann - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hartmann disclosed a non-pecuniary interest, for transparency purposes as a Ward Member for Fawley, Blackfield, Calshot & Langley. He concluded there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Meeting:  Wednesday, 12th March, 2025 9.00 am - Planning Committee

3g Walcot House, Blackfield Road, Fawley, SO45 1ED (Application 25/10058)

  • Cllr Matthew Hartmann - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hartmann disclosed a non-pecuniary interest, for transparency purposes as a Ward Member for Fawley, Blackfield, Calshot & Langley. He concluded there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Meeting:  Wednesday, 14th May, 2025 9.00 am - Planning Committee

3d Little Acre, 8 Dark Lane, Blackfield, Fawley, SO45 1WB (Application 25/10210)

  • Cllr Matthew Hartmann - Non Pecuniary - Cllr M Hartmann disclosed a non-pecuniary interest in application 25/10210 and explained that he was a member of Fawley Parish Council, whose planning committee had expressed a view on the matter. However, he was not a member of their planning committee, nor had he expressed a view on the scheme. Therefore, he concluded there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Meeting:  Wednesday, 13th August, 2025 9.00 am - Planning Committee

3g 10 Newlands Close, Blackfield, Fawley, SO451WH (Application 25/10479)

  • Cllr Matthew Hartmann - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hartmann disclosed a non-pecuniary interest in application 25/10479 and explained that the application site is within his Ward however he confirmed he was not a member of the Parish Council and had therefore not participated nor passed comment on the application. He concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Meeting:  Wednesday, 14th January, 2026 9.00 am - Planning Committee

3e Forest View, Kings Copse Road, Blackfield, Fawley, SO45 1XF (Application 25/10784)

  • Cllr Matthew Hartmann - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hartmann disclosed a non-pecuniary interest in application 25/10784 and explained that although the site was in his ward he had not discussed nor passed comment on the application. He concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Meeting:  Wednesday, 11th February, 2026 9.00 am - Planning Committee

3c Site of Fawley Power Station, SO45 1TW (Application 25/10970)

  • Cllr Matthew Hartmann - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hartmann declared a non-pecuniary interest as the local ward member and as a member of Fawley Parish Council, which had commented on the application. He reported that he had not expressed a view on the application, and therefore concluded there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Meeting:  Wednesday, 11th February, 2026 9.00 am - Planning Committee

3d Site of Fawley Power Station, SO45 1TW (Application 25/10971)

  • Cllr Matthew Hartmann - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hartmann declared a non-pecuniary interest as the local ward member and as a member of Fawley Parish Council, which had commented on the application. He reported that he had not expressed a view on the application, and therefore concluded there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Meeting:  Wednesday, 11th February, 2026 9.00 am - Planning Committee

3e Site of Fawley Power Station, SO45 1TW (Application 25/10972)

  • Cllr Matthew Hartmann - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Hartmann declared a non-pecuniary interest as the local ward member and as a member of Fawley Parish Council, which had commented on the application. He reported that he had not expressed a view on the application, and therefore concluded there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.