Declarations of interest for agenda item '11 St Johns Street, Hythe (Application 16/10658)'
- Cllr Alison Hoare - Personal - On the grounds that they knew the applicant who was a former member of this Committee. They concluded that the degree of acquaintance was not sufficient to create the impression of bias and therefore there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.
- Cllr David Harrison - Personal - On the grounds that he was a close personal friend of the applicant. He concluded that the degree of acquaintance was sufficient to create the impression of bias and there were therefore grounds under common law to prevent him from taking part in the consideration and voting. He left the meeting for this item.
- Cllr Diane Andrews - Personal - On the grounds that they knew the applicant who was a former member of this Committee. They concluded that the degree of acquaintance was not sufficient to create the impression of bias and therefore there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.
- Cllr Maureen Holding - Personal - On the grounds that they knew the applicant who was a former member of this Committee. They concluded that the degree of acquaintance was not sufficient to create the impression of bias and therefore there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.
- Cllr Michael Thierry - Personal - On the grounds that they knew the applicant who was a former member of this Committee. They concluded that the degree of acquaintance was not sufficient to create the impression of bias and therefore there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.
- Cllr Peter Armstrong - Personal - On the grounds that he knew the applicant who was also a member of Hythe and Dibden Parish Council. He concluded that the degree of acquaintance was not sufficient to create the impression of bias and therefore there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from taking part in the consideration or voting.