Declarations of interest

 Declarations of interest for agenda item 'Testwood Club, 110 Salisbury Road, Totton (Application 21/10693)'

  • Cllr Ann Sevier - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Sevier for transparency purposes declared a non-pecuniary interest as a member of the Housing and Homelessness Overview and Scrutiny Panel. She concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent her from remaining in the meeting to speak and vote.
  • Cllr Anne Corbridge - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Corbridge for transparency purposes declared a non-pecuniary interest as a member of the Housing and Homelessness Overview and Scrutiny Panel. She concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent her from remaining in the meeting to speak and vote.
  • Cllr Arthur Davis - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Davis disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of Totton and Eling Town Council which had commented on the application. He concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.
  • Cllr Christine Ward - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Ward for transparency purposes declared a non-pecuniary interest as a member of the Housing and Homelessness Overview and Scrutiny Panel. She concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent her from remaining in the meeting to speak and vote.
  • Cllr Kate Crisell - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Crisell disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of the Planning Committee of Totton and Eling Town Council which had commented on the application. Cllr Crisell, for transparency purposes also reported she was a member of the Housing and Homelessness Overview and Scrutiny Panel. She concluded that as she had not expressed a view or voted on the application there were no grounds under common law to prevent her from remaining in the meeting to speak and vote.
  • Cllr Mahmoud Kangarani - Non Pecuniary - Cllr Kangarani disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of Totton and Eling Town Council which had commented on the application. He concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.