Issue - decisions

RESOLVED:

1.     That the continued purpose of the UK SPF be noted;

2.     That the allocation of 25/26 UKSPF funding towards specific projects as set out in the report be supported; and

3.     That delegated authority is given for future decision making associated with the finalisation of the project programme for 25/26 UKSPF spend to the Strategic Director for Place Operations and Sustainability, in consultation with the Portfolio Holder for Planning and Economy.

KEY DECISION:

Yes

PORTFOLIO:

Planning and Economy

ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS CONSIDERED/REJECTED:

As set out in the report.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST:

None

DISCUSSION:

The Portfolio Holder for Planning and Economy presented the report, highlighting that it was an opportunity for the Council to support to the local economy.  Funding was proposed to support projects for start up businesses, apprenticeships, digital skills, business growth and those not in education employment or training (NEET).  In addition to this, three capital projects were proposed.  The total funding was for £313,000 towards the projects detailed in Table 1 of the report, as well as a small management fee.  The full list of projects which had been considered was detailed in Appendix 1.

The Assistant Director for Place Development, expressed thanks to the member engagement which had taken place through the democratic process.  The recommendations proposed, had been mindful that there was a predominant focus on revenue expenditure to support the development of skills and to support local businesses.  Funding needed to be spent by 31 March 2026 and therefore it would be a challenge to ensure this work was completed.

A number of non-Cabinet members spoke in support of the recommendations within the report.

The issue of NEET and digital skills was raised by a non-Cabinet member recognising that might be based around the educational facilities and highlighted that the District had poor public transport links, which might be a barrier for some residents to access these courses.  It was suggested that the provision of this could be delivered in the community which would be more accessible.  The Assistant Director of Place Development acknowledged this as an issue and reported it would be considered when engaging with educational providers.

A number of non-Cabinet Members spoke about the reconnection of Calshot bus services, which had been identified as a potential project which had not been recommended to receive funding.  The value of this project was recognised, and a non-Cabinet member highlighted that discussions were taking place regarding funding with for example, Hampshire County Council and Community First.  Further detailed information was requested regarding the reasons behind why the project was not being supported at the current time and it was agreed this would be provided outside of the meeting, directly to the councillor.