Agenda and minutes

Apologies were received from Cllr D Poole.

The Leader announced that the New Forest District Council (NFDC) Local Plan review had progressed to the public consultation stage, which was a key priority for the Council.

Furthermore, NFDC continued to provide clear information to support residents in understanding the key issues and trade-offs involved, and the Council was now inviting residents to comment on the Spatial Options and Policy Directions Regulation 18 document. The consultation had been running since 6 February and would continue until 20 March, giving residents a clear opportunity to engage with the emerging strategy.

Early engagement had been encouraging, with strong attendance at the first drop?in sessions. Nearly 500 people attended the first three drop-in sessions, together with high levels of interest across the digital channels which had resulted in over 50 formal responses to the consultation in just over a week.

The Leader encouraged ward members to ensure that their communities responded to the options proposed whilst not forgetting the set of key policies which shaped how the Council managed growth and protected its unique environment. 

The Leader explained that the positive start set the scene for the full Local Plan update coming to Cabinet later in the year, where the emerging themes from public feedback would be reported. 

To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 4 February 2026 as a correct record.

RESOLVED:

That the minutes of the meeting held on 4 February 2026 be confirmed and signed.

To note any declarations of interest made by members in connection with an agenda item.  The nature of the interest must also be specified.

Members are asked to discuss any possible interests with Democratic Services prior to the meeting.

There were no declarations of any disclosable pecuniary interests made by Cabinet Members.

To receive any public participation in accordance with the Council’s public participation scheme.

There was no public participation.

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet recommend that Council approves:

1.     that from 06 April 2026, an increase in dwelling rents of 4.8% from the 2025/26 weekly rent level, in accordance with Government guidelines, be agreed;

2.     that from 06 April 2026, an increase in garage rents of 4.8% from the 2025/26 weekly rent level be agreed;

3.     that from 06 April 2026, shared ownership property rents be increased in line with the applicable rent review provisions within each lease. For the eight properties held under leases allowing RPI+0.5%, an increase of 5.00% from the 2025/26 weekly rent level be agreed, for all properties which are subject to CPI+1% under the current model lease, an increase of 4.8% be agreed and the weekly rent of one property sold under previous legislation be agreed to increase by 4.8%;

4.     that from 06 April 2026 Service Charges will continue to reflect actual charges;

5.     that the HRA budget, as set out in Appendix 1 of this report, be agreed; and

6.     that a Housing Capital Programme to 2028/29, as set out in Appendix 4, be agreed.

KEY DECISION:

Report to Cabinet and Council.

PORTFOLIO:

Housing and Homelessness

ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS CONSIDERED/REJECTED:

As set out in the report.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST:

None.

DISCUSSION:

The Portfolio Holder for Housing and Homelessness presented the report. He was pleased that the proposed Housing and Revenue Account (HRA) budget for 2026/27 was a balanced budget. He explained that the budget underpinned the corporate plan priorities and was supported by a 30-year business plan forecast.  

He highlighted several points of significance within the report. These included:  

• A £19 million spend on the maintenance of tenants’ properties in 2026/2027. 

• A £15.2 million spend on the continued development and acquisition of new Council dwellings.  

• There would be rent increases in order to achieve a balanced budget, however these were in line with the Government’s guidelines. 

• A £1.3 million budget was proposed to ensure continued and improved fire safety compliance. 

• A £3 million budget was proposed for Home Energy Improvement programmes.  

The Assistant Director of Finance provided further information on the report. He explained in further detail the recommendations before Cabinet, including increases to rent and service charges plus the approval of the HRA Capital Programme. 

He explained that, as required, the HRA budget was balanced and was also supported by the 30-year business plan. The proposed HRA budget prudently maintained the HRA reserve of £1 million. Cabinet heard that there was sufficient capacity within the budget to meet statutory, regulatory and landlord obligations. It was reported that rents were being increased by 4.8% in line with Government policy. The enhanced level of income would enable the Council to continue to invest in its existing housing stock. The Assistant Director for Finance summarised the various elements of the budget, including the Capital Programme. The report had been considered by the Tenant Involvement Group and the Council’s Housing and Communities Overview and Scrutiny Panel. 

The Assistant Director of Finance explained that there were certain corrections  ...  view the full minutes text for item 80.

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet recommend to Council that:

1.     the updated Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP) and financial strategy, as set out in the report and throughout appendices 1-3 be approved.

2.     there is a General Fund Net Budget Requirement in 2026/27 of £26.630 million, as set out in appendices 5a - 5d of the report;

3.     the New Forest District Council Band D Council Tax for 2026/27 shall be £211.92 (paragraph 37);

4.     the General Fund Capital Programme for 2026/27 of £14.646 million, as set out in appendix 6 to this report be approved; and

5.     the proposed fees and charges as included at appendix 7 to the report be approved.

KEY DECISION:

Report to Cabinet and Council.

PORTFOLIO:

Finance and Corporate

ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS CONSIDERED/REJECTED:

As set out in the report.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST:

None.

DISCUSSION:

The Portfolio Holder for Finance and Corporate introduced the report. He explained that the Council had produced a balanced budget for 2026/2027. He congratulated the hard work that had gone into the budget, though acknowledged the challenges facing the Council with a medium-term financial gap of £3.4 million. The Council was running a Capital Programme for 2026/27 of £14.646 million which would enable the Council to  deliver a range of projects across the district. He commented on the detrimental impact that the Government’s ‘Fair Funding’ Review had on the Council’s finances.  Despite promises of new burdens funding to support food waste collection, the Council was going to receive £1.2 million less funding than it received now. 

The Portfolio Holder confirmed that council tax would increase by 2.99%, with District Council tax increasing by £211.92 for a band D dwelling, which equated to an increase of £3.95 a week. 

Cabinet heard that the extended producer’s responsibility funding was increasing to £2.4 million. The Council aligned its budgets with the corporate priorities with, among other things, focus on the new waste service, public conveniences refurbishments and a new Council ICT service.  

The Assistant Director of Finance explained that the Council had a balanced General Fund budget for 2026/27 including a net budget requirement of £26.6 million. This had been achieved without the need to use the budget equalisation reserve; however, the medium-term forecast did identify a £3.4 million deficit. The Government’s Fair Funding review had disproportionately affected rural and District councils, with a reduction in funding of £1.2 million over the settlement period. Grant simplification has rolled up several previously discreet grants into the overall revenue support grant contributing to the overall reduction, additionally the Council had not received the previously assumed £1.5 million food waste funding reductions. Council tax had been increased by 2.99% in line with Government limits.  Within the budget there had been service investment across the Council’s key priorities with enhancement in several service areas and resources provided for the LGR process.  

It was explained that there was additional income through the extra £1.3 million EPR money as well as an additional £1.9 million from fees and charges, contractual income growth  ...  view the full minutes text for item 81.

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet recommends that Council:

1.     Notes the outcome of the referendum of 29 January 2026; and

2.     Agrees that the Lymington and Pennington Neighbourhood Plan be ‘made’ (adopted) as part of the Development Plan for New Forest District (Outside the National Park).

KEY DECISION:

Report to Cabinet and Council.

PORTFOLIO:

Planning and Economy

ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS CONSIDERED/REJECTED:

As set out in the report.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST:

None.

DISCUSSION:

The Portfolio Holder for Planning and Economy introduced the report. He explained that neighbourhood plans gave communities a direct role in the development of their local area. The plan had been developed over the last 10 years, with work being led by the Lymington and Pennington Town Council steering group, supported by NFDC and the National Park Authority. A referendum was held on 29 January which resulted in a 92.5% vote in support of the adoption of the plan. If NFDC were to formally adopt the plan at Council, it would form a part of the statutory development plan and would guide decisions made on planning applications.  

Non-Cabinet members congratulated the various bodies that had worked on the development of the plan and acknowledged the benefit it would bring the local area.  

The Planning Policy Team Leader gave thanks to those who had worked on the plan including, the Neighbourhood Plan steering group, the wider community and the Council’s Electoral Services team who facilitated the referendum.  

A non-Cabinet member asked a question on the development of the Fawley neighbourhood plan, to which Officers would respond after the meeting.