Items
No. |
Item |
|
Apologies
Apologies for absence were received from Cllrs
Rostand and Wappet.
|
29. |
Minutes
To confirm the minutes of the Planning
Development Control Committee meeting held on 13 December 2017 as a
correct record.
Minutes:
RESOLVED:
That the minutes of the meeting of the
Planning Development Control Committee held on 13 December 2017 be
signed by the Chairman as a correct record.
|
30. |
Declarations of Interest
To note any declarations
of interest made by members in connection with an agenda
item. The nature of the interest
must also be specified.
Members are asked to discuss any possible
interests with Democratic Services prior to the meeting.
Minutes:
Cllr Crisell disclosed a non-pecuniary
interest in application 17/11383 as a member of Totton and Eling
Town Council which had commented on the application.
Cllr Davis disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in application 17/11383 as a member of Totton and Eling Town
Council which had commented on the application.
Cllr Frampton disclosed a non-pecuniary
interest in applications 17/11414 and 16/10443 as a member of
Bransgore Parish Council which had commented on the
applications. He disclosed a further
disclosable pecuniary interest in application 17/11414 as he owned
the neighbouring property.
Cllr L Harris disclosed a non-pecuniary
interest in application 17/11383 as a member of Totton and Eling
Town Council which had commented on the application.
Cllr Harrison disclosed a non-pecuniary
interest in application 17/11383 as a member of Totton and Eling
Town Council which had commented on the application.
Cllr Olliff-Cooper disclosed an interest in
application 17/10854 on the grounds that he knew the applicant.
Cllr Penson disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in applications 17/11552, 17/10854 and 17/11503 as a member of
Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application.
Cllr White disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in applications 17/11552, 17/10854 and 17/11503 as a member of
Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application. He disclosed a further
interest in application 17/10854 as he knew the applicant.
|
31. |
Planning Applications for Committee Decision
To determine the applications set out
below:
|
31a |
Glendalyn, Fernhill Lane, New Milton (Application 16/11586) PDF 11 MB
Three-storey 54 bed care
home; landscaping; parking; demolition of existing.
RECOMMENDED:
Service Manager Planning and Building Control
Authorised to Grant Permission
Minutes:
Details:
|
Three-storey 54 bed care home;
landscaping; parking; demolition of existing
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Brockbank – Applicant’s
Agent
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
3
further letters of objections, in the same terms as set out in
paragraph 10 of the report.
The
applicant had requested that consideration of the application be
deferred to allow changes to be negotiated that would meet the
operational requirements of the end user.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
The
officer’s recommendation was amended to defer the application
to allow changes to be negotiated that would meet the operational
requirements of the end user, and in recognition that there was an
identified need for care home places in the District.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
That
consideration of this application be
deferred for negotiations.
|
|
|
|
31b |
The Lillies, Cooks Lane, Calmore, Totton (Application 17/11383) PDF 6 MB
Development of 7 dwellings comprised 1
detached house; 3 pairs of semi-detached houses; car port; bin
stores; bike stores; parking; landscaping; demolition of
existing.
RECOMMENDED:
Refuse
Minutes:
Details:
|
Development of 7 dwellings
comprised 1 detached house; 3 pairs of semi-detached houses; car
port; bin stores; bike stores; parking; landscaping; demolition of
existing
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Christian – Applicant’s Agent
Mr
Marlow - Objector
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Crisell, Davis, L Harris and Harrison disclosed non-pecuniary
interests as members of Totton and Eling Town Council which had
commented on the application. They concluded that there were no
grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the
meeting to speak and to vote.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal Reasons:
|
As per
report (Item 3(b)).
|
|
|
|
|
31c |
Land Adjacent Godwins Mede, Poplar Lane, Bransgore (Application 17/11414) PDF 853 KB
8 dwellings comprised 1 pair of semi-detached
houses; 6 detached houses; parking (Outline application with
details only of access, layout and scale).
RECOMMENDED:
Grant Permission subject to Conditions.
Minutes:
Details:
|
8 dwellings comprised 1 pair of
semi-detached houses; 6 detached houses; parking (Outline
application with details only of access, layout and
scale)
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Annen – Applicant’s
Agent
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
Two
further letters of objection in the same terms as set out in
paragraph 10 of the report.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllr
Frampton disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of
Bransgore Parish Council which had commented on the
application. He disclosed a further
disclosable pecuniary interest on the grounds that he owned
neighbouring land. Having left
the meeting he took no part in the consideration and did not
vote.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Grant
planning permission.
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
As per
report (Item 3(c)).
|
|
|
|
|
31d |
The Salvation Army, Roundhill, Fordingbridge (Application 17/11517) PDF 4 MB
Glazed shelter (Variation of Condition 1 of
planning permission 16/11076 to allow the continued use until 30
October 2020) (Retrospective)
RECOMMENDED:
Refuse.
Minutes:
Details:
|
Glazed shelter (variation of
condition 1 of planning permission 16/11076 to allow the continued
use until 30 October 2020) (retrospective)
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
French – Applicant’s Representative
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
1
additional letter of support
|
|
|
Comment:
|
The
Committee noted that the structure that had been granted temporary
consent was still in good condition. It
was recognised that the structure provided essential storage to
support services that were valued in the local community and that
transparent materials were necessary in order to be light weight
and to deter anti-social behaviour, which was an acknowledged
problem in this area. On this basis the
Committee concluded that a further temporary consent should be
granted.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
That
temporary consent be granted until 30
October 2020.
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
Such
conditions as the Service Manager Planning and Building Control
deems appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31e |
North End Cottage, North End, Damerham, Fordingbridge (Application 17/11520) PDF 4 MB
Single storey rear
extension; porch.
RECOMMENDED:
Refuse.
Minutes:
Details:
|
Single storey rear extension;
porch
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mrs
Simmons - Applicant
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
1
additional letter from the applicant’s agent, which had been
circulated to all members of the Committee.
Letter
of Support from Damerham Parish Council, as set out in the update
circulated prior to the meeting.
Letter
of support from Cllr E J Heron, which was submitted to the
meeting.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
None
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal Reasons:
|
As per
report (Item 3(e)).
|
|
|
|
|
31f |
Chilfrome, Lower Pennington Lane, Pennington, Lymington (Application 17/11552) PDF 2 MB
Two-storey
rear extension; single-storey front extension; roof alterations to
existing single storey front elevation.
RECOMMENDED;
Refuse.
Minutes:
Details:
|
Two-storey rear extension;
single-storey front extension; roof alterations to existing single
storey front elevation
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Hawkins – Applicant’s Agent
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Penson and White a disclosed non-pecuniary interest as members of
Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application. They concluded that there
were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in
the meeting to speak and to vote.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal Reasons:
|
As per
report (Item 3(f)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31g |
Land of Buckland Granaries, Sway Road, Lymington (Application 17/10854) PDF 13 MB
Development of 12 houses comprised; 2 terraces
of 3 houses; 1 terrace of 2 houses; 4 detached houses; access;
landscaping; parking; demolition of existing buildings.
RECOMMENDED:
Grant Permission subject to Conditions.
Minutes:
Details:
|
Development of 12 houses
comprised: 2 terraces of 3 houses; 1 terrace of 2 houses; 4
detached houses; access; landscaping; parking; demolition of
existing buildings
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Whild – Applicant’s
Agent
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
Hampshire County Council’s Flood and Water Management Team
had requested further information and clarification.
The
Conservation Officer was happy with revisions to the roof pitch on
pots 8-10 but maintained his concerns about the layout of the
central courtyard.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs Penson and White
disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as members of Lymington and
Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application. Cllr Penson concluded that
there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from
remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote. Cllr White disclosed a further interest on the
grounds that he knew the applicant well. As he could be perceived
to be biased he left the meeting and took no part in the
consideration and voting.
Cllr Olliff-Cooper disclosed a
personal interest on the grounds that he knew the applicant well.
As he could be perceived to be biased he left the meeting and took
no part in the consideration and voting.
The officer’s
recommendation was amended to the Service
Manager Planning and Building Control authorised to grant
permission subject to:
i)
The receipt of no new material objections to the
submitted
amended plans before 25 January 2018
ii)
The provision of a satisfactory layout for the
central courtyard
iii)
The imposition of the conditions set out in the
report and any further conditions that the Service Manager
Planning and Building Control deems
appropriate.
The Committee was advised that
the Flood and Water Management Team’s concerns could be
addressed by an additional condition and informative note, as set
out in the update circulated prior to the meeting. In addition, the Conservation Officer’s
concerns would be addressed by the submission of amended plans for
the layout of the courtyard.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Service
Manager Planning and Building Control authorised to grant
permission
|
|
|
Conditions/
Agreements/
Negotiations:
|
Subject to:
(i)
The receipt of no new material objections to the
submitted amended plans before 25 January 2018
(ii)
The provision of a satisfactory layout for the
central courtyard
(iii) The imposition of the conditions set out in the report and any
further conditions that the Service Manager Planning and Building
Control deems appropriate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31h |
Arrachar, Fox Pond Lane, Pennington, Lymington (Application 17/11503) PDF 355 KB
Outbuilding.
RECOMMENDED:
Grant Permission subject to Conditions.
Minutes:
Details:
|
Outbuilding
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Latimore – Objector
Mr King
- Objector
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Penson and White disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as members of
Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application. They concluded that there
were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in
the meeting to speak and to vote.
The
Committee noted that consent had been granted for an outbuilding in
the rear garden of this property but considered that the increased
size now proposed represented an overdevelopment of the
site. In addition, there would be an
unacceptable loss of the oasis of green garden area to the rear of
the properties that would be out of character with this garden
setting.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused.
|
|
|
Refusal Reasons:
|
The proposed outbuilding by reason of its
size, height and location would be an overdevelopment of the site,
out of character within its garden setting and contrary to Policy
CS2 of the Core Strategy for the New Forest District outside the
National Park and the Lymington Local Distinctiveness Supplementary
Planning Document
|
|
|
|
|
31i |
Land at Roeshot and Burton, Hinton, Bransgore (Application 16/10443) PDF 968 KB
Use of land as Natural Green Space (SANG)
RECOMMENDED:
That the Council be recommended to authorise
entering into an Inter-Authority in the terms set out in the
report.
Minutes:
Details:
|
Use of land as Natural Green
Space (SANG)
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
None
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllr
Frampton disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of
Bransgore Parish Council which had commented on the
application. He concluded that there
were no grounds under common law to prevent him from remaining in
the meeting to speak and to vote.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
RECOMMENDED:
That authorisation be given to enter the
Inter-Authority Agreement in accordance with the details set out
Report Item 3 (i) to the Planning
Committee.
|
|
|
|