Items
No. |
Item |
|
Apologies
Apologies for absence were received from Cllrs
Hopkins, Olliff-Cooper and C Ward.
|
4. |
Minutes
To confirm the minutes of the meetings held on
9 May and 14 May 2018 as correct records.
Minutes:
RESOLVED:
That the minutes of the meetings held on 9 May
and 14 May 2018 be signed by the Chairman as correct records.
|
5. |
Declarations of Interest
To note any declarations
of interest made by members in connection with an agenda
item. The nature of the interest
must also be specified.
Members are asked to discuss any possible
interests with Democratic Services prior to the meeting.
Minutes:
Cllr Beck disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in application 18/10060 as a member of New Milton Town Council
which had commented on the application.
Cllr Clarke disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in application 18/10416 as a member of New Milton Town Council
which had commented on the application, and on whose behalf he was
speaking.
Cllr Frampton disclosed a disclosable
pecuniary interest in application 18/10240 as the adjoining land
owner.
Cllr Glass disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in application 18/10176 as a member of Fawley Parish Council which
had commented on the application.
Cllr Penson disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in applications 17/11702, 18/10101, 18/10403, 18/10277 and 18/10386
as a member of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had
commented on the applications.
Cllr Rostand disclosed a non-pecuniary
interest in application 18/10277 as a member of Lymington and
Pennington Town Council which had commented on the application.
Cllr Thorne disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in application 18/10176 as a member of Fawley Parish Council which
had commented on the application.
Cllr White disclosed a non-pecuniary interest
in applications 17/11702, 18/10101, 18/10403, 18/10277 and 18/10386
as a member of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had
commented on the applications.
|
6. |
Planning Applications for Committee Decision
To determine the applications set out
below:
|
6a |
3 Strides Lane, Ringwood (Application 17/11246) PDF 2 MB
Change of use from retail to residential;
dormer; rooflight
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Change of use from residential;
dormer; rooflight
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Hayward - Applicant
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
The
officer’s recommendation was amended by the inclusion of an
additional condition, as set out in the update circulated prior to
the meeting.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Permission
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
As per
report (Item 3(a)), with the following additional
condition:
7. The installation of fittings
and fixed appliances in the dwelling(s) hereby approved shall be
designed to limit the consumption of wholesome water to 110 litres
per person per day in accordance with Regulation 36(2)(b) of Part G of the Building Regulations 2010 as
amended.
Reason: The higher optional standard
for water efficiency under Part G of the Building Regulations is
required in order to reduce waste water discharge that may
adversely affect the River Avon Special Area of Conservation by
increasing phosphorous levels or concentrations and thereby
contribute to the mitigation of any likely adverse impacts on a
nationally recognised nature conservation interest.
|
|
|
|
|
6b |
54 Belmore Lane, Lymington (Application 17/11702) PDF 1 MB
2 detached two storey houses; 3 garages;
landscaping; new access
RECOMMENDATION:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
2 detached two storey houses; 3
garages; landscaping; new access
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Davies – Applicant’s Agent
Mr
Lavender – Objector
Mr
Smith - Objector
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
7
additional letters of objection, in the same terms as set out in
the report.
The
Tree Officer raised no objection subject to the imposition of an
additional condition, as set out in the update circulated prior to
the meeting.
The
applicant had submitted amended plans to remove the eaves overhang
from the buildings so the dimensions of the dwellings matched the
existing floor plan.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Penson and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of
Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application. They concluded that there
were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in
the meeting to speak and to vote.
The
officer’s recommendation was amended by the addition of a
condition, and revised wording to condition 2, as set out in the
update circulated prior to the meeting.
The
Committee noted, with concern, that further inaccuracies in the
plans had been corrected by the submission of amended details late
the previous evening and considered whether the application should
be deferred to allow proper assessment of the effect of those
amendments. They noted with additional
concern that the objector speaking at the meeting had drawn their
attention to further inaccuracies, including incorrectly showing
the site to be level, instead of sloping as was obvious in the
photographs of the site. This would affect the relationship with
the properties in Old Farm Walk.
The
Committee considered that the proposed development with 2 large
detached properties represented an over development of the
site. The narrowness of the gap between
the two proposed houses, and between those houses and No 19 Old
Farm Walk, was out of character with the area, as set out in the
Lymington Local Distinctiveness document. This was compounded by the excessive height and
bulk of the proposed properties. The
proximity of one of the houses to No 19 Old Farm Walk would
inevitably lead to the loss of the vegetation screen along that
boundary and, with no room for alternative planting to provide
screening, together with the sloping site increasing the height of
the patio proposed for that property, would lead to an unacceptable
degree of overlooking and loss of privacy to that neighbouring
property. The siting of the bin store
was also cause for concern.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal reasons:
|
1.
The proposed development would result in overdevelopment of the
site with buildings of excessive bulk, scale and height in close
proximity to each other which would be out of character with the
surrounding more spacious pattern of development which is mainly
characterised by lower buildings in a more spacious setting. As a
result the proposals would be contrary to Policy CS 2 of the
Core Strategy for the New Forest District outside the National Park
and the Lymington Local Distinctiveness Supplementary Planning
Document.
2. The relationship of the proposed house ...
view the full minutes text for item 6b
|
|
6c |
The Dome, 121 Barton Court Avenue, Barton-on-Sea, New Milton (Application 18/10060) PDF 904 KB
Roof alterations in association with extension
to two existing flats; creation of first-floor roof terrace;
replace conservatory with single-storey front extension;
fenestration alterations
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Roof alterations in association
with extension to two existing flats; creation of first-floor roof
terrace; replace conservatory with single-storey front extension;
fenestration alterations
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Glenister - Objector
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
2
additional letters from 1 objector
1
additional letter of explanation from the applicant.
The
Highway Authority had expanded their comments, as set out in the
update circulated prior to the meeting
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllr
Beck disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of New Milton
Town Council which had commented on the application. He concluded that there were no grounds under
common law to prevent him from remaining in the meeting to
speak. He did not have a
vote.
Cllr
Beck addressed the Committee to oppose the application.
Members
noted that there was evidence that parking spaces on the site were
being allocated to the flats being sold, which was contrary to the
planning requirements for the site and the undertakings being given
by the applicant. The Committee
considered that the provision of a proper bin store was essential
to prevent refuse sacks being damaged, allowing domestic waste to
be released onto the site. They also
sought clarification about the provision of storage for bicycles
and mobility scooters; the degree to which the site was affected by
policies restricting development in an area of coastal change; and
the exact terms of the lawful uses on the site.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
That
consideration of this application be deferred for the further
information set out above to be provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6d |
Site of Solent Works, North Close, Lymington (Application 18/10101) PDF 1 MB
Variation of condition 3 of Planning
Permission 16/10886 to allow amended plans RF08 Rev D and RF10 Rev
D, RF09 Rev C, RF07 Rev C to allow external material changes to
south, north and rear elevations (Amended Plans)
RECOMMENDED:
Service Manager Planning and Building Control
authorised to grant permission subject to conditions.
Minutes:
Details:
|
Variation of Condition 3 of
Planning Permission 16/10886 to allow amended plans RF08 Rev D and
RF10 Rev D, RF09 Rev C, RF07 Rev C to allow retention of external
material changes to front and side elevations (amended
plans)
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Ms
Baker – Applicant’s Agent
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
The
Environmental Health Officer raised no objections, subject to the
imposition of the conditions already included in the
recommendation.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Penson and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of
Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application. They concluded that there
were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in
the meeting to speak and to vote.
Members
were advised of a change to the description of the development, as
set out in the update circulated prior to the meeting.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Service
Manager Planning Development Control authorised to grant planning
permission
|
|
|
Conditions/
agreements/
negotiations:
|
As per
report (Item 3(d)).
|
|
|
|
|
6e |
Beach Hut 319, Cliff Road, Milford-on-Sea (Application 18/10111) PDF 633 KB
Two solar panels to beach hut
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Two solar panels to beach
hut
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Dr
Pruss – Applicant
Miss
England – Applicant’s Supporter
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
The
Committee supported the suggestion that a policy on solar panels on
beach huts should be developed for inclusion in Part 2 of the Local
Plan.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Permission
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
As per
report (Item 3(e)).
|
|
|
|
|
6f |
Amberwood, 91 Milford Road, Pennington, Lymington (Application 18/10403) PDF 779 KB
Detached double garage and storeroom
RECOMMENDED:
Grant subject to Conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Detached double garage and
storeroom
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
None
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Penson and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of
Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application. They concluded that there were no grounds under common
law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to
vote.
The
Committee was advised of revised wording to condition 3, as set out
in the update circulated prior to the meeting.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Permission
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
As per
report (Item 3(f)), with condition 3 amended as follows:
3. The existing hedge trees and
plants on the north (front) boundary of the site with Milford Road
shall be retained and maintained. Any
trees or plants within this hedge which within a period of 5 years
from the completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or
diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others
of similar size or species, unless the Local Planning Authority
gives written consent to any variation.
Reason: To minimise the visual
impact of the proposed development within the street scene and to
comply with Policy CS2 of the Local Plan for New Forest District
outside the National Park (Core Strategy)
|
|
|
|
|
6g |
Oak Nursery School, 11 Long Lane, Holbury, Fawley (Application 18/10176) PDF 850 KB
Use as residential
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Use as residential
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mrs
Lohur - Applicant
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
The
applicant had submitted details of the marketing exercise
undertaken and the responses received, as set out in the update
circulated prior to the meeting
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Glass and Thorne disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of
Fawley Parish Council which had commented on the
application. The concluded that there
were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in
the meeting to speak and to vote.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Permission
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
As per
report (Item 3(g)).
|
|
|
|
|
6h |
21 Kennard Road, New Milton (Application 18/10198) PDF 1 MB
1 Block of 9 flats and 1 maisonette; cycle and
bin store; parking
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
1 block of 9 flats and 1
maisonette; cycle and bin store; parking
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
None
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
The
Highway Authority had expanded their comments, as set out in the
update circulated prior to the meeting.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Members
were advised that essential plans were missing from the information
available at the meeting. Consequently
the officer’s recommendation was amended to defer
consideration of this application.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
That
consideration of this application be deferred to allow the
Committee to have access to all the relevant plans
|
|
|
|
6i |
Jaluch House, 5 Deweys Lane, Ringwood (Application 18/10231) PDF 1 MB
Change of use from office to use as two flats
and parking
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Change of use from office to
use as two flats and parking
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
None
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
The
officer’s recommendation was amended by the inclusion of an
additional condition, as set out in the update circulated prior to
the meeting.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Permission
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
As per
report (Item 3(i)), with the following
additional condition:
7. The installation of fittings
and fixed appliances in the dwelling(s) hereby approved shall be
designed to limit the consumption of wholesome water to 110 litres
per person per day in accordance with Regulation 36(2)b of Part G
of the Building Regulations 2010 as amended.
Reason: The higher optional standard
for water efficiency under Part G of the Building Regulations is
required in order to reduce waste water discharge that may
adversely affect the River Avon Special Area of Conservation by
increasing phosphorous levels or concentrations and thereby
contribute to the mitigation of any likely adverse impacts on a
nationally recognised nature conservation interest.
|
|
|
|
|
6j |
Land adjacent Godwins Mede, Poplar Lane, Bransgore (Application 18/10240) PDF 927 KB
Development of 8 dwellings comprised: 1 pair
of semi-detached houses; 6 detached houses; 3 detached garages; 1
car port and 1 four bay car port, landscaping, parking (details of
appearance and landscaping, development granted by Outline
Permission 17/11414) (Reserved Matters)
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Development of 8 dwellings
comprised; 1 pair semi detached houses;
6 detached houses; 3 detached garages; 1 car port and 1 four bay
car port, landscaping; parking (details of appearance and
landscaping, development granted by Outline Permission
17/11414)
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Ms
Glover – Applicant’s Agent
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllr
Frampton disclosed a disclosable pecuniary interest as he owned
neighbouring land. Having left the
meeting he took no part in the consideration and voting.
The
officer’s recommendation was amended by the inclusion of an
additional condition, as set out in the update circulated prior to
the meeting. In addition, members were
reassured that the conditions would ensure that there was clarity
that the treatment of the front boundary would be a hedge together
with a post and rail fence.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Permission
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
As per
report (Item 3(j)), with additional condition:
6. The
installation of fittings and fixed appliances in the dwelling(s)
hereby approved shall be designed to limit the consumption of
wholesome water to 110 litres per person per day in accordance with
Regulation 36(2)b of Part G of the
Building Regulations 2010 as amended.
Reason: The higher optional standard
for water efficiency under Part G of the Building Regulations is
required in order to reduce waste water discharge that may
adversely affect the River Avon Special Area of Conservation by
increasing phosphorous levels or concentrations and thereby
contribute to the mitigation of any likely adverse impacts on a
nationally recognised nature conservation interest.
Together with such other amendments to the conditions as may be
necessary to secure the front boundary treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
6k |
Lake House, Woolmer Lane, Blashford, Ringwood (Application 18/10274) PDF 1 MB
House; parking and landscaping; ecological
enhancements; demolition of existing
RECOMMENDED:
Refuse
Minutes:
Details:
|
House; parking and landscaping;
ecological enhancements; demolition of existing
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr
Packman – Applicant’s Agent
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
Further
letter from the applicant, as set out in the update circulated
prior to the meeting.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Members
were advised of a minor amendment to paragraph 14.3.2 of the
report, as set out in the update circulated prior to the
meeting.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal reasons:
|
As per
report (Item 3(k)).
|
|
|
|
|
6l |
27B St Thomas Street, Lymington (Application 18/10277) PDF 1 MB
Use of first-floor and new second floor as two
maisonettes; entrance lobby and cycle/bin store on ground floor;
roof alterations; ground-floor front extension; front dormers;
rooflights; fenestration alterations;
access deck; railings (amended plans)
RECOMMENDED:
Refuse
Minutes:
Details:
|
Use of first-floor and new
second floor as two maisonettes, entrance lobby and cycle/bin store
on ground floor; roof alterations; ground floor front extension;
front dormers; rooflights; fenestration alterations; access deck;
railings (amended plans)
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
None
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
2
further letters of support.
Additional comments from the Conservation Officer.
Revised
comments from Lymington and Pennington Town Council
A
further letter of support from the applicants
Further
details of all of these representations were set out in the update
circulated prior to the meeting.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Penson, Rostand and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as
members of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had
commented on the application. They concluded that there were no
grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the
meeting to speak, and in the case of Cllr Penson and White, to
vote. Cllr Rostand did not have a
vote.
Cllr
Rostand addressed the Committee in support of the
application.
The
Committee concluded that the proposed development was acceptable to
achieve the provision of much needed accommodation in the town
centre. They concluded that the
proposed infill between the 2 roof slopes would not be visually
intrusive when viewed from the street.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Permission
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
Such
conditions as the Service Manager Planning Development Control
deems appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
6m |
3 Lymefields, Milford-on-Sea (Application 18/10477 PDF 771 KB
Roof alterations in association with new first
floor; two-storey rear extension; balcony; single-storey front,
rear and side extensions; porch; fenestration alterations
RECOMMENDED:
Grant Subject to Conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Roof alterations in association
with new first floor; two-storey rear extension; balcony;
single-storey front, rear and side extensions; porch; fenestration
alterations
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Miss
Skeat – Applicant’s Agent
Mr
Hallows – Objector
Parish
Cllr Taylor – Milford on Sea Parish Council
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
A
supporting statement from the Applicant’s Agent had been sent
directly to all members of the Committee.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
The
Committee was advised of revisions to conditions, as set out in the
update circulated prior to the meeting.
Members
concluded that the proposed development would be out of character
within the bungalows in Lymefields
which had a distinct and uniform design.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal reasons:
|
The proposed development, by
reason of its scale, height, bulk and materials would appear as an
incongruous and intrusive feature within the street scene, totally
out of character with the distinctive low key bungalows of which it
forms a part. As such it would be contrary to Policy CS2 of the
Core Strategy for the New Forest (outside of the National
Park)
|
|
|
|
|
6n |
Dell Cottage, Buckland Dene, Lymington (18/10386) PDF 855 KB
Outbuilding
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Outbuilding
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
None
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllrs
Penson and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of
Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the
application. They concluded that there
were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in
the meeting to speak and to vote.
The
Committee was advised of revisions to the conditions, as set out in
the update circulated prior to the meeting.
The
Committee concluded that the proposed outbuilding, placed in front
of the property, would be unduly intrusive within the street scene,
contrary to the provisions of the Lymington Local Distinctiveness
document
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal reasons:
|
The proposed outbuilding by
reason of its forward location relative to the dwelling would
result in an intrusive feature within the street scene detrimental
to the prevailing character of the area and contrary to Policy CS2
of the Core Strategy for the New Forest (outside of the National
Park) and the Lymington Local Distinctiveness Supplementary
Planning Document
|
|
|
|
|
6o |
39 Marley Avenue, New Milton (Application 18/10416) PDF 1021 KB
Pool/therapy building; single-storey side
extension
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Pool/therapy building;
single-storey side extension
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mrs
Haddock – Applicant
Mrs
Ward – Objector
Cllr
Clarke – on behalf of New Milton Town Council
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
An
additional letter from the Applicant’s Agent had been sent
directly to all members of the Committee.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
Cllr
Clarke disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of New Milton
Town Council which had commented on the application, and on whose
behalf he was speaking. He concluded
that there were no grounds under common law to prevent him from
remaining in the meeting to speak. He
did not have a vote.
The
Committee was advised that a corrected site plan had included as
part of the update circulated prior to the meeting.
The
Committee concluded that this large building, placed adjacent to
the boundary along the entire side boundary of the garden of the
adjoining property, would be unduly intrusive and cause
unacceptable harm to the enjoyment of that property by its
occupiers.
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal reasons:
|
The
proposed outbuilding by reason of its bulk, scale, height and
location in close proximity to the rear boundary of the site would
result in an over dominant building leading to an unacceptable
degree of enclosure to No 2 Cabot Way to the detriment to their
reasonable amenity. As such it would be
contrary to Policy CS2 of the Core Strategy for the New Forest
(outside of the National Park)..
|
|
|
|
|
6p |
North End Cottage, North End, Damerham (Application 18/10423) PDF 779 KB
Single-storey rear extensions; rear porch
RECOMMENDED:
Refuse
Minutes:
Details:
|
Single storey rear extensions;
rear porch
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
Mr Pike
– Applicant’s Agent
Parish
Cllr Crane – Damerham Parish Council
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
A
comment in support of the application had been received from the
local ward councillor, Cllr E J Heron, as set out in the update
circulated prior to the meeting.
|
|
|
Comment:
|
None
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Refused
|
|
|
Refusal reasons:
|
As per
report (Item 3(p)).
|
|
|
|
|
6q |
Phoenix Youth Centre, Culver Road, New Milton (Application 18/10441) PDF 1 MB
Variation of condition 2 of planning
permission 17/10160 to allow new plan numbers: 7186-P003 Rev D,
7186-P011 Rev C, 7186-P012 Rev D, 7186-P013 Rev B, 7186-P014 Rev D,
7186-P015 Rev E, 7186-P016 Rev D, 7186-P017 Rev D, 7186-P018 Rev D,
7186-P020 Rev B, 229-400 Rev 02, 229-300 Rev 01, 229-903, 229-901,
229-904, 229-SH 002 Issue 2 (Planting Schedule), 229-SP-001 (Soft
Landscaping Specification); removal of conditions 3, 6, 7 and 9
RECOMMENDED:
Grant permission subject to conditions
Minutes:
Details:
|
Variation of condition 2 of planning
permission 17/10160 to allow new plan numbers: 7186-P003 Rev D,
7186-P011 Rev C, 7186-P012 Rev D, 7186-P013 Rev B, 7186-P014 Rev D,
7186-P015 Rev E, 7186-P016 Rev D, 7186-P017 Rev D, 7186-P018 Rev D,
7186-P020 Rev B, 229-400 Rev 02, 229-300 Rev 01, 229-903, 229-901,
229-904, 229-SH 002 Issue 2 (Planting Schedule), 229-SP-001 (Soft
Landscaping Specification); removal of conditions 3, 6, 7 and 9
|
|
|
Public Participants:
|
None
|
|
|
Additional Representations:
|
None
|
|
|
Comment:
|
None
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Permission
|
|
|
Conditions:
|
As per
report (Item 3(q)).
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Adjournment and Resumption of Meeting
Minutes:
The Committee adjourned for lunch at 1.55 p.m.
and resumed and 2.30 p.m. with the following members present:
*
Cllr W G Andrews (Chairman)
* Cllr P J Armstrong
(Vice-Chairman)
Councillors:
|
Councillors:
|
* Mrs S M Bennison
* Mrs F Carpenter
Ms K V Crisell
* A H G Davis
R L Frampton
* A T Glass
* L E Harris
* D Harrison
* Mrs M D Holding
|
Mrs C Hopkins
J M Olliff-Cooper
* A K Penson
* Miss A Sevier
* Mrs B J Thorne
Mrs C V Ward
* M L White
* Mrs P A Wyeth
|
*Present
Officers Attending:
S Clothier,
Miss J Debnam, Mrs J Garrity, D Groom and
Mrs A Wilson,
Applications 18/10403, 18/10198, 18/10231,
18/10386 and 18/10441 were determined after the adjournment for
lunch.
|