Agenda and minutes

Details:

Variation of Condition 2 of Planning Permission 11/97730 to allow accommodation for 10 people in care

Public Participants:

Mrs Knibbs – Objector

Mrs Bassage – Objector’s representative

Additional Representations:

Highway Authority – raised no objection following the submission of an amended parking layout, subject to the imposition of conditions.

Comment:

Cllrs Rippon-Swaine and Thierry disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Ringwood Town Council which had commented on the application. They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

The Committee considered that they had insufficient evidence to evaluate the effect of the increase in the number of residents on the character of the area and the amenities of neighbouring residents.

Decision:

That consideration of this application be deferred to allow further information to be provided about the effect of the increase in the number of residents on the character of the area and the amenities of neighbouring residents.

Details:

Single-storey front, side and rear extensions; rooflights

Public Participants:

None

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

Cllrs Penson, Rostand and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the application. They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(b))

Details:

Variation of Condition 1 and 2 of Planning Permission 13/10077 to allow continued temporary storage of caravans, camper vans, trailers, boats and vans for a period of 3 years

Public Participants:

Town Cllr Read - New Milton Town Council

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

The Officer’s recommendation was amended by the wording of condition 2 being altered to read “…trailers, boats and one commercial van and for no other purpose…”.

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(c)), with condition 2 amended to refer to “…trailers, boats and one commercial van and for no other purpose…”.

Details:

Tarmac games court; 2 and 3 metre high fencing

Public Participants:

Parish Cllr Whitlock – Applicant

Mr Hutchins – Objector

Dr Owen - Objector

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

Cllrs Beeton and Kendal addressed the Committee to oppose the application.

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(d))

Details:

Detached garage; flue

Public Participants:

None

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

Cllrs Penson, Rostand and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the application.  They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(e))

Details:

Shopfront alterations

Public Participants:

None

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

Cllrs Penson, Rostand and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the application.  They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

An amended plan and revised Design and Access Statement had been received but not in time for formal responses to be received from either the Conservation Officer or the Town Council.  The Officer’s recommendation was therefore changed to defer consideration of this application until comments had been received following re-consultation.

Decision:

That consideration of this application be deferred to allow the receipt of consultation responses.

Details:

Display 2 wall-mounted signs; 1 vinyl door sign; 1 fascia sign (Application for Advertisement Consent)

Public Participants:

None

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

Cllrs Penson, Rostand and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the application.  They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

An amended plan and revised Design and Access Statement had been received but not in time for formal responses to be received from either the Conservation Officer or the Town Council.  The Officer’s recommendation was therefore changed to defer consideration of this application until comments had been received following re-consultation.

Decision:

That consideration of this application be deferred to allow the receipt of consultation responses.

Details:

Extend side dormer; front; side and rear dormer to create 2 additional flats; window alterations

Public Participants:

Town Cllr Read – New Milton Town Council

Additional Representations:

1 additional letter from an objector reiterating their previous concerns and, in addition, raising concerns about loss of privacy.

Comment:

None

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(h))

Details:

Raise ridge height to increase first-floor living space; roof lights; roof alterations; dormers; two-storey extension; move main entrance to front; porch; fenestration alterations

Public Participants:

Town Cllr Treleaven – Ringwood Town Council

Additional Representations:

A representation from the occupiers of 20 Fairlie, concerned about overlooking, devaluation of property, trees not screening in autumn/winter months; and not on building line.

Comment:

Cllrs Rippon-Swaine and Thierry disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Ringwood Town Council which had commented on the application.  They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(i))

Details:

Display 1 illuminated pole-mounted sign; non-illuminated fascia sign; 1 letter sign; 3 post-mounted signs; 2 canopy signs (Application for Advertisement Consent)

Public Participants:

None

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

Cllrs Penson, Rostand and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the application.  They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(j))

Details:

Variation of Conditions 3 and 4 of the Planning Permission 13/11416 to allow plan number 13004/PL10 rev P1 to alter landscaping and verge

Public Participants:

Mr Saunders – Objector

Parish Cllr Ironside – Hordle Parish Council

Additional Representations:

A written representation from Cllr Carpenter was submitted to the meeting (Cllr Carpenter was not present for the determination of this item)

Comment:

The Officer’s recommendation was amended by the addition of 3 conditions.

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(k)), with the following additional conditions:

6. Visibility splays of 2.4 metres by 21 metres shall be provided at the junction of the proposed private shared drive with Hare Lane public highway and this visibility splay shall thereafter be kept free of any obstacles over 600mm in height at all times.

Reason: In the interest of highway safety and in accordance with Policies CS1 and CS10 of the Core Strategy for the New Forest District outside the National Park.

7. The drainage shall be maintained in accordance with the details approved by the Council's decision letter of September 3rd 2013.

Reason: In order to ensure that the drainage arrangements are appropriate and in accordance with Policy CS2 of the Core Strategy for the New Forest District outside the National Park and the New Forest District Council and New Forest National Park Authority Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Local Development Frameworks.

8. In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the approved development that was not previously identified under application 98418, it must be reported in writing immediately to the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of condition 9 of 98418, and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of condition 10 of 98418, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme a verification report must be prepared, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority in accordance with condition 11 of 98418.

Reason: To ensure that risks from land contamination to the future users of the land and neighbouring land are minimised, together with those to controlled waters, property and ecological systems, and to ensure that the development can be carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other offsite receptors in accordance with Policy CS5 of the Core Strategy for the New Forest District outside the National Park.

Details:

Raise roof height; dormers and rooflights in association with new first floor; two-storey rear extension; single-storey side and rear extension; front porch; decking

Public Participants:

Mr Henderson – Applicant’s Agent

Town Cllr Read – New Milton Town Council

Additional Representations:

A written representation from Cllr Carpenter was submitted to the meeting (Cllr Carpenter was not present for the determination of this item).

An additional representation from the occupier of 25 Dilly Lane concerned about loss of privacy on the grounds that the new windows would have views into their kitchen/breakfast and living room.

An additional letter from the applicant’s agent had been circulated to members.

Comment:

None

Decision:

Refused

Refusal Reasons:

As per report (Item 3(l))

Details:

Replacement roof and cladding; additional windows

Public Participants:

None

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

Cllrs Penson, Rostand and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the application.  They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

The Committee considered that, following the submission of amended plans to retain a solid gable at each end of the roof, the proposal now represented an acceptable design solution.

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

Such conditions as the Service Manager for Planning and Building Control deems appropriate.

Details:

Two-storey side and rear extension; pitched roof over front porch and bay

Public Participants:

None

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

Cllrs Penson, Rostand and White disclosed non-pecuniary interests as members of Lymington and Pennington Town Council which had commented on the application.  They concluded that there were no grounds under common law to prevent them from remaining in the meeting to speak and to vote.

Para 12.1 was corrected in the last line to refer to application ref 16/10200 (not 16/10119)

The recommendation was subject to no further material comments being received following expiration of consultation period.  The consultation period expired on 13 July 2016.

Decision:

Subject to no further material comments being received following expiration of the consultation period, on 13 July 2016, the Service Manager for Planning and Building Control be authorised to grant planning consent.

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(n))

Details:

Extend outbuilding and alterations to windows and door including Juliet balcony

Public Participants:

Mr Huggett – Applicant’s Agent

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

None

Decision:

Refused

Refusal Reasons:

As per report (Item 3(o))

Details:

Single-storey rear extension; front porch; fenestration alteration

Public Participants:

Town Cllr Read – New Milton Town Council

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

None

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(p))

Details:

Display illuminated fascia sign and non-illuminated window and door signs (Application for Advertisement Consent)

Public Participants:

Town Cllr Read – New Milton Town Council

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

The Town Council had been re-consulted following the receipt of an amended plan to accord with the proposed shopfront.  The recommendation was therefore changed to defer consideration of this application until their comments had been received.

Decision:

That consideration of this application be deferred to allow the receipt of the Town Council’s comments following re-consultation.

Details:

Use of barn as 1 residential dwelling; single-storey extension and associated alterations; detached garage; boundary wall

Public Participants:

Mr Haigh - Applicant

Additional Representations:

None

Comment:

None

Decision:

Planning consent

Conditions:

As per report (Item 3(r))